Skip to content
“As liquid credit strategies struggle to source for yield, private debt asset class may supplement investor’s traditional credit portfolio, and at the same time, may offer diversification and a risk-adjusted source of long-term income.”

2020 was an unprecedented period of global turmoil as the world was forced to adapt to a universal healthcare crisis and governments responded with extraordinary monetary policies devised to save global economies. In March 2020, few investors would have speculated that financial markets would end 2020 on such a positive note, but investors have begun to reassess market conditions and reflect on emerging opportunities and risks as we move into 2021.

The unprecedented monetary support for markets in 2020 has left liquid credit classes at record low yields, forcing investors to consider alternative asset classes in search of yield while concerns over valuations in equity markets continue to make investors nervous. The spectre of inflation also hangs over markets as economic growth improves, although unlikely to rise too far too fast to alter highly accommodative central bank policy positioning. Momentum in US and Chinese economies is improving as vaccination programs are implemented on a broad scale, but Europe continues to battle with a second wave of COVID-19 that has forced many of their economies back into lockdown. Thus, while there are reasons for a positive outlook, global economies are only just stepping into a post-pandemic recovery.

Investors dependent on dividends as a reliable source of income saw their returns fall throughout 2020 as companies moved towards more conservative dividend pay-out policies to conserve cash and improve balance sheets as they adjusted to pandemic conditions. An analysis of 2020 dividend pay-outs by the world’s biggest firms indicated a fall of 17.5–20%, equivalent to USD 263 billion, in response to the pandemic1. To protect against this loss in income, investors that can take a longer-term view are increasing portfolio allocations in alternatives to 23% as they source returns and income away from traditional fixed income and equity holdings2.

In response to current liquid credit yields, investors have been increasing allocations (Exhibit A) to global private debt markets to offset the income losses across their credit portfolios and take advantage of capital appreciation opportunities that have emerged.

To understand the opportunities in private credit, it is valuable to understand the structural changes that have allowed private credit markets to flourish, particularly in the Unites States.

With higher yields hard to find elsewhere, two thirds of investors surveyed intend to increase investment in private credit.

Exhibit A: How Surveyed Investors Plan to Allocate to Private Debt by 2025

Source: Preqin Investor Survey August 2020.

2008: The Rise of Non-bank US Middle Market

Following the 2008 financial crisis and the implementation of Basel III and US Federal Reserve regulation relating to bank lending, US banks have steadily reduced their exposure to small and mid-size enterprises (SMEs) while shifting their focus towards investment grade corporate issuance. The resulting void in lending markets across SME businesses was filled by non-bank financial institutions and investment funds that provide vital funding to these institutions while also generating attractive investment returns over bank-sponsored credit (Exhibit B).

“The US middle market is a critical sector of the American economy and an important engine of job creation accounting for the majority of new US jobs since 2008 and 27% of US annual income. Remarkably, 75% of companies in the middle market category have been in business over 20 years.”

Exhibit B: Relationship between Bank and Non-bank Lending for Leveraged Loans

Source: S&P LCD Leveraged Lending Review Q4 2020

Private Debt Financing Plugs the Gap in the US Middle Market in Covid-19 Era

As 2020 unfolded attention was drawn to prospects in the US middle market where bank lending became severely constricted and private debt opportunities emerged. The US middle market is comprised of companies that generate between USD 10 million and USD 1 billion in revenue per company per annum, representing 200,000 US businesses. Embodying USD 9.3 trillion in annual revenue and 52 million employees, the sector is commonly referred to as ‘the market that moves America.’ The US middle market is a critical sector of the American economy and an important engine of job creation accounting for the majority of new US jobs since 2008 and 27% of US annual income. Remarkably, 75% of companies in the middle market category have been in business over 20 years3.

US middle market companies suffered significant revenue impact because of COVID-19 and were initially supported by select government relief programs that provided incremental liquidity to American businesses, taking the form of both direct funding facilities (Payment Protection Program) and indirect programs utilising banks and savings and loan institutions as lending conduits to main street businesses. While these programs provided a lifeline to countless US businesses, many businesses did not qualify or declined these programs due to restrictive loan covenants and instead sought capital from private capital providers.

The dramatic realignment of middle market borrowing factors in the US markets resulting from the pandemic moved from traditional demand factors, being financing for M&A activity, recapitalisation of corporate balance sheets, debt refinancing and general corporate purposes, to a bifurcated market defined as liquidity-driven and fundamentally-driven demand (Exhibit C).

Exhibit C: Covid-19 Impact on Private Markets

Dramatic Realignment of Borrowing Demand

Source: Franklin Templeton.

“As markets emerge from the pandemic, investors are likely to remain faced with highly accommodative central bank policies that are likely to constrain liquid credit market yields, suggesting that private debt strategies may offer an attractive supplement to their traditional credit portfolios.”

Liquidity Concerns Reset Private Debt Lending Terms, Transferring Pricing Power to the Lender

As private market debt demand rose throughout 2020, the requirements for borrowers changed considerably. Concerned about liquidity constraints like those experienced during the global financial crisis, many corporates drew down revolving credit lines quickly. Private debt managers focused on sustaining the capital requirements of their portfolio companies by offering short term bridge-financing or renegotiating payment schedules to reduce the burden on corporate balance sheets. Funding requirements varied across industries, with telecoms, IT infrastructure and business services rebounding quickly while retail, gaming, leisure, and travel sectors continue to see revenues impacted by the pandemic.

As a result, private debt lenders saw middle market lending terms reset as the pandemic unfolded with increases across pricing (first lien and unitranch), original issue discounts and equity cushions, as well as tighter credit documentation (Exhibit D).

Exhibit D: Private Middle Market Terms Have Reset

Note: Views expressed are those of Franklin Templeton.

Source: Franklin Templeton; SPP Capital Survey from Leveraged Commentary and Dara (LCD) article entitled: “Private Lenders Look Past Shutdown for Clues About New Landscape” dated April 16, 2020.

Private Debt’s Role in Investment Portfolio

As markets emerge from the pandemic, investors are likely to remain faced with highly accommodative central bank policies that are likely to constrain liquid credit market yields, suggesting that private debt strategies may offer an attractive supplement to their traditional credit portfolios. The forms of these returns are represented by the current illiquidity premium (additional income derived from surrendering the optionality of liquidating the position on demand) currently available in private debt markets, the consistent requirement for capital across US middle market corporates (USD 462 billion of middle market loan maturities over 6 years4) and increasing M&A activity introduced by improving economic fundamentals post-COVID-19.

Private debt may play an increasingly important role in investor portfolios through the introduction of diversification and a risk-adjusted sources of long-term income. Analysis over a 10-year period ending in Q3 2020 revealed direct lending strategies outperformed levered loans and high yield with lower overall volatility5.

While credit losses have been in line with levered loans and high yield over the same period, manager selection is an important criterion to ensure that risk/return outcomes remain attractive. Private debt managers with a history of disciplined loan structuring and underwriting, in combination with a deep network of sponsored and non-sponsored deal sourcing remains a significant competitive advantage in this increasingly valuable sector.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

This site is intended only for APAC Institutional Investors and Consultants. Using it means you agree to our Anti-Corruption Policy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.