Executive summary
The escalation in the Middle East is primarily a macro-through-energy shock, with higher oil and gas prices driving inflation, tightening financial conditions, and reshaping emerging market (EM) performance. While EM assets have shown resilience so far, the duration of the conflict and persistence of elevated energy prices will determine whether this remains a contained event or evolves into a broader macro disruption.
What is the market impact of the Middle East escalation on EM debt?
The escalation has triggered a classic risk-off response, led by energy price shocks and tighter financial conditions.
Markets have reacted quickly:
- Energy prices surged sharply (oil and gas)
- Equity markets declined
- Bond yields and volatility rose
- The US dollar strengthened
- Gold underperformed due to higher real yields
At the same time, EM assets have shown relative resilience, with only moderate declines and continued inflows into EM debt—an unusual divergence during risk-off episodes.
What this signals:
Markets are pricing disruption—but not yet a prolonged crisis.
Why are energy markets central to the macro impact?
Energy is the primary transmission channel from geopolitics to global inflation and growth.
Roughly 20% of global oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making even partial disruption highly consequential.
Key dynamics:
- Supply disruptions → higher oil and gas prices
- Higher energy costs → rising global inflation
- Inflation persistence → fewer rate cuts and tighter policy
- Tighter conditions → weaker growth and risk sentiment
Gas markets have been particularly volatile, with some contracts rising dramatically due to infrastructure disruptions and reduced production.
Key takeaway:
Energy shocks are not just sector-specific—they reset the macro path for inflation, rates, and growth.
How does this affect monetary policy and financial conditions?
Higher energy prices increase the likelihood that central banks delay easing and maintain restrictive policy.
Markets have already adjusted expectations:
- Fewer anticipated US rate cuts
- Higher bond yields
- Stronger US dollar
For emerging markets:
- Currency depreciation risks increase imported inflation
- Central banks may need to hold or raise rates to defend credibility
- Growth may weaken as policy remains restrictive
Framework: Policy trade-off in EM
| Objective | Pressure from energy shock |
|
Inflation control |
Upward pressure |
|
Currency stability |
Increased volatility |
|
Growth support |
Constrained |
Which emerging markets are most exposed—and why?
EM performance will diverge based on four key factors: energy exposure, policy credibility, financing risk, and proximity to the conflict.
- Energy exposure
- Winners: Energy exporters (e.g., Angola, Nigeria, Malaysia) benefit from improved trade balances
- Losers: Energy importers (e.g., Maldives, Lebanon, Thailand) face widening deficits and inflation pressure
- Policy buffers
Countries with:
- Credible central banks
- Strong FX reserves
- Disciplined fiscal frameworks
…are better positioned to absorb shocks.
- External financing risk
Vulnerabilities increase where:
- Foreign investor participation is high
- External funding needs are elevated
- USD strength pressures local markets
- Geographic proximity
Countries closer to the conflict face:
- Direct disruption risks
- Tourism and capital flow declines
- Higher geopolitical risk premia
What investors should know:
This is not a uniform EM story—dispersion will dominate returns.
How could the duration of the conflict change outcomes?
The length of the conflict is the single most important variable for markets.
Current pricing assumes a relatively short disruption. However:
- With a multi-week conflict as the base case
- A longer disruption could trigger:
- Sustained oil supply constraints
- Sharply higher prices
- Broader macro spillovers
There is also asymmetric risk:
- Limited upside if the conflict resolves quickly
- Significant downside if it persists or escalates
Key takeaway:
Markets appear to be underpricing tail risks tied to prolonged supply disruption as of this writing.
What are the key risks investors should monitor?
The primary risks relate to escalation, energy supply disruption, and financial spillovers.
Core risks
- Oil supply disruption (especially Hormuz chokepoint)
- Non-state actor escalation (e.g., broader regional conflict)
- USD strength tightening global liquidity
- Delayed monetary easing globally
EM-specific risks
- Currency depreciation amplifying inflation
- Fiscal strain from energy subsidies
- Reduced external financing access
Tail risk
A prolonged conflict leading to:
- Structural repricing of geopolitical risk
- Persistent inflation
- Sustained pressure on global growth
What are the portfolio implications for investors?
Positioning should reflect higher dispersion, energy sensitivity, and macro uncertainty.
Key considerations:
- Preference for hard currency (HC) over local currency (LC) debt in volatile environments
- Focus on idiosyncratic credits less exposed to macro shocks
- Cautious stance on:
- Energy importers with weak buffers
- Countries reliant on external financing
At the same time, geopolitical dislocations can create selective opportunities, particularly where fundamentals remain strong but risk premia widen.
Read the full report
For a detailed breakdown of market moves, country exposures, and portfolio positioning, read the full white paper:
It provides deeper analysis, data, and scenario considerations to support investment decision-making in a rapidly evolving geopolitical environment.
Make emerging markets a continuous conversation
Markets don’t stand still—and neither does our thinking. Join a growing community of investors who receive our latest emerging markets research, data-driven insights, and evolving views as global conditions change.