Skip to content

Preview

Why are proofs valuable?

Since the 1970s, research in cryptographic primitives has led to advances in proofs that have provided two useful innovations. The first is data compression: decreasing computa­tional power or bandwidth required to solve a problem without a material change in the result. The second is security. The first interactive proof involved flipping a “fair” coin over a telephone. What does this mean? Cryptographic primitives1 enabled two people with no physical access to each other or a shared coin (trusted or otherwise) to determine the result of a 50/50 “coin flip” in a completely trustless manner by following a protocol. That protocol is an interactive proof.

Please note that the trust-minimized environment created by proofs is different than the trust-minimized environment created by consensus mechanisms2 which utilize majority rule alongside proofs known as cryptographic signatures. Cryptographic signatures3 are a form of a zero-knowledge proof.

This paper covers:

  • Why are proofs valuable?
  • What are the current substitute products for proofs?
  • Why should you care?
  • How do proofs work?
  • What are the critical proof strategies and their features?
  • Problems that proofs must solve to become commercially viable
  • What are the solutions to the problems?
  • Who is working on these problems?
  • Key terms


IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

This site is intended only for APAC Institutional Investors and Consultants. Using it means you agree to our Anti-Corruption Policy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.