Skip to content

The start of the next Federal Reserve (Fed) easing cycle now seems imminent, raising questions about the performance of longer-dated Treasury bonds—those with 20-year and 30-year maturities. What is the best time to position in long-duration bonds?

This chart shows the excess return on long-term US Treasuries versus cash. The dots on the chart indicate federal funds rate cuts, while gray shading denotes recessions. The period between 1986 and 2021 was unusually favorable for fixed income, and the trend of 4.6% annualized excess return seen during that time likely will not be repeated in the future. Instead, the focus should be on when bonds have performed well—or poorly—compared to the overall trend.

Longer-duration bonds have not performed particularly well at the start of Fed policy easing cycles with the exception of 1984-1986, when the Treasury yield curve was upward-sloping at exceptionally high real rates. Even during recessions in 1990, 2001, and the first half of 2008, long bonds struggled at the beginning of the easing cycle.

Historically, long-term bonds have done particularly well once the Fed cuts rates substantially, the yield curve is very steep, and the economy is relatively slow to respond to monetary stimulus. Examples can be seen in 1992-1993, 2002-2003, and 2010-2013.

As one would expect, long bonds also have performed well in response to large exogenous shocks. For instance, long-term Treasuries performed well in the wake of the following crises: Black Monday stock market crash in October 1987; Russian debt default and Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) bailout in 1998; Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in 2008; China currency devaluation and capital flight in 2015; and the COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020.

Finally, long bonds often do well in anticipation of Fed easing cycles. For example, long-dated Treasuries performed strongly in the first halves of 1989, 1995, and 2019, respectively, and during 2000, just before the Fed began cutting rates.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that unless a large financial shock occurs, long-duration bonds might struggle to outperform shorter-duration bonds in the early stages of the Fed easing cycle. This potential underperformance could be more likely given how flat the yield curve is now



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

This site is intended only for APAC Institutional Investors and Consultants. Using it means you agree to our Anti-Corruption Policy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.