Skip to content

During the 2000s, following the US equity bear market and the rise of China, the US private sector invested heavily overseas to capitalize on more attractive investment opportunities. Over time, this trend led to a substantial improvement in the US net income balance—namely, the difference between what the US earns on its investments overseas minus what it pays to foreign investors in US assets (see Exhibit 1). While the US remained a net debtor to the world in aggregate because foreign central banks still owned sizeable amounts of US Treasuries, it became a sizeable net creditor to the private sector globally. For the purposes of understanding prospective capital flows and market implications, what matters are the decisions of private sector entities, and by 2012, the private sector held a sizeable short position in the US dollar (USD).

Exhibit 1: US Net Income Balance

As of October 1, 2023
%GDP, Seasonally Adjusted.

Source: Macrobond (© 2024). There is no assurance any forecast, projection or estimate will be realized. 

From Net Short to Significant USD Long Position

Over the last decade, this trend has massively reversed. As I discussed in a recent podcast, it has been the US that has experienced superior growth and asset market performance. On the one hand, the shifting economic model in China, characterized by lower leverage, a weaker property sector, and higher geopolitical risk, and the dual sovereign and banking crises in Europe lowered growth expectations in both regions. On the other hand, renewed technology leadership, resurgent manufacturing, and newfound energy independence via shale gas and oil raised US growth expectations.

As a consequence, private sector capital flows have shifted significantly. Since 2010, foreign investment into the US has surged, such that the net investment position of the US private sector has swung from a $2 trillion (net) surplus to around an $11 trillion (net) deficit. Nearly $9 trillion of that change occurred over the past seven years (see Exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2: US Net Investment Position – Private Sector

As of January 1, 2023
USD Trillions

Source: Macrobond (© 2024).

As a share of gross domestic product (GDP), the US has shifted from overweighting foreign assets to the tune of 15% GDP to now underweighting foreign assets in the vicinity of 40% GDP. Alternatively, foreign investors have shifted from underweighting the US by 15% GDP to overweighting US assets by 40% GDP (see Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 3: US Net Investment Position – Private Sector

As of January 1, 2023
%GDP

Source: Macrobond (© 2024).

This is not to say that investors are wrong in favoring US assets. Investors’ overweight exposure to US assets may well be justified if the US continues to offer better returns on investments than those offered in other parts of the world. Indeed, recent US growth and equity outperformance is validating the overweight position.

However, the point here is that investors are already heavily positioned for US growth and asset market outperformance, a dramatic change from investor positioning in 2010. The margin for error for the US is now much, much lower—if the US economy and markets disappoint, there are now trillions of dollars that could exit US markets.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

This site is intended only for APAC Institutional Investors and Consultants. Using it means you agree to our Anti-Corruption Policy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.