Evolving Fed expectations and asset-allocation implications

Key points:

• The current macro backdrop is slightly atypical for an impending Federal Reserve (Fed) easing cycle—growth and labor markets remain strong, while inflation levels are elevated despite progress over the past year.
• The policy backdrop is also notable as Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members broadly see current policy levels as restrictive.

• In our opinion, the implications for multi-asset investors remain positive for equities. We believe reflationary macro conditions and a peak in the fed funds rate (our base case) are supportive regimes for risk-taking in portfolios.

Is this time different?

Expectations for a Fed easing cycle have evolved tremendously since the beginning of the year, when the market was pricing in approximately six rate cuts. When will it happen, or will it happen, and what does it mean for asset allocation? 

To answer these questions, we start with examining the macro backdrop relative to other Fed easing cycles. The famous question that continually plagues investors bears repeating: “Is this time different?” Through a macro lens, things do appear slightly different—growth and labor are not weakening, and inflation levels remain slightly elevated relative to the previous 30 years despite significant progress since inflation’s peak in 2022 (Exhibit 1).

The macro backdrop displays some important differences versus history, but what about the policy backdrop? Although there is a debate among market participants around how restrictive Fed policy currently is, there appears to be consensus in the Fed’s interest-rate projections (known as the “dot plot”) that the FOMC views current policy levels as restrictive (Exhibit 2).¹

Importantly, market pricing has focused on when Fed rate cuts would begin, rather than if they will begin (Exhibit 3). The expected timing of the first rate cut has increasingly been delayed, although broad market pricing still expects the Fed to begin its easing cycle this year. Our view aligns with the market here—we think Fed policy rates have reached their peak for this cycle.

Asset-allocation implications

If we are at peak rates, what does the current macro context mean for asset allocators?

Let’s start with the macro differences. It’s atypical to have reflation—which we define as rising growth and above-average inflation—ahead of Fed rate cuts. If we continue to have reflation, is this a negative backdrop for multi-asset portfolios? Our analysis suggests that it is not. In fact, reflation has been a positive regime for equities, where returns have been positive and slightly above their long-run average (Exhibit 4).

We also analyze how equities behave following a peak in the fed funds rate (Exhibit 5). We acknowledge the timing of a Fed cut is uncertain, so we focus on equity performance following a peak in the fed funds rate. It turns out that equities have tended to perform well, provided a recession is avoided. For now, with US nonfarm payroll growth averaging 244,000 per month over the last year (and rising), we feel that recession risks remain low.

Putting it all together leads us to think of the old adage, “history doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” We feel this historical analysis has provided a decent guide for how to navigate the current environment. It is understandable that delayed Fed rate cuts have caused some market volatility, especially after equity markets rose 25.1% trough-to-peak in approximately five months.²  Nonetheless, we believe a reflationary macro environment is nothing to fear. In fact, it has historically been a supportive environment for risk-taking in multi-asset portfolios.   

Our analysis also plays an important role in how we assess the current Fed rate cycle. While there is a healthy debate around the timing of the Fed easing cycle, we worry less about the delay of Fed rate cuts provided the economy remains strong. Policy is always intended to balance the macro economy, and that’s what we believe is currently taking place. Overall, we continue to remain constructive in our portfolios, with a slight preference for equities versus fixed income.