Skip to content

While at times overlooked, dividends have played a substantial role in investor returns over the past several decades. From 1960 through the end of last year, roughly 85% of the S&P 500 Index’s cumulative total return can be attributed to reinvested dividends and the power of compounding. Dividend-focused strategies provide the potential for better stability, consistent income, and a hedge against economic uncertainty for all-weather portfolios.

As a new environment of tariff turmoil in the United States continues to prompt market volatility, investors are increasingly turning to dividend-focused strategies to boost portfolio resilience. Following an era dominated by growth stocks, dividend investing has seen something of a revival. US-listed, dividend-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) saw average monthly net inflows of nearly US$3.3 billion for the six months ending January 31, 2025, compared to US$107 million for the same period last year.1

The current murky global outlook understandably has investors seeking refuge in more stable components for a balanced portfolio. Dividend stocks—especially those with high-quality characteristics—can offer steadier and more predictable cash flows. And since such cash flows are key to many equity valuation models, estimating the intrinsic or fundamental value of dividend-paying stocks tends to involve less ambiguity than attempting to pinpoint fair valuations for growth stocks. Therefore, we believe dividend stocks can serve as a buffer in a diversified portfolio.

In our opinion, the appeal lies in their ability to moderate volatility during market drawdowns, while still offering significant upside potential. Dividend strategies have consistently demonstrated defensive properties across regions and varying timeframes. For the three-year period ending December 31, 2024, both volatility and maximum drawdowns for dividend payers were lower compared to the broad market across global, US and European exposures.2 When inflation and interest-rate fears reignited last August, dividend stocks held up comparatively well.3

Broad Market vs. Dividends Risk Comparison

Note: Blue denotes lower max drawdowns/volatility.

Source: Bloomberg, analysis by Franklin Templeton. 2025. Data refers to the following indexes: MSCI ACWI Net Total Return USD Index, MSCI ACWI High Dividend Yield USD Net Total Return Index, MSCI USA Net Total Return USD Index, MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Net Total Return USD Index, MSCI Europe Net Total Return EUR Index and MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield Net Return EUR Index. The MSCI ACWI captures large- and mid-cap representation across 23 developed markets (DM) and 24 emerging market (EM) countries. The MSCI USA Index is designed to measure the performance of the large- and mid-cap segments of the US market. The MSCI Europe Index captures large- and mid-cap representation across 15 DM countries in Europe. The MSCI ACWI High Dividend Yield Index, MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Index and MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield Index are based on their respective parent indexes, the MSCI ACWI, MSCI USA Index and MSCI Europe Index. They are designed to reflect the performance of equities in their parent index (excluding REITs) with higher dividend income and quality characteristics than average dividend yields that are both sustainable and persistent. The indexes also apply quality screens and review 12-month past performance to omit stocks with potentially deteriorating fundamentals that could force them to cut or reduce dividends. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.

Perhaps as a testament to the value investors place on the dividends in their portfolios, we have seen strong asset gathering in US-listed dividend ETFs even when fixed income ETFs are paying attractive yields. Dividend ETFs that target US exposures continue to dominate market share of U.S-domiciled ETFs, holding US$360 billion in assets (76% of all dividend ETF assets), with US$17.5 billion in new assets over the past year.4

International developed market dividend ETFs—which still comprise just a fraction of the US market—have also grown in popularity and attracted nearly US$3 billion in net inflows last year, representing 13% of total dividend ETF inflows.5

There are various approaches to dividend investing across this large pool of assets. For example, we’ve seen income-hungry investors making core allocations to rules-based, or multifactor, dividend strategies that incorporate active risk awareness by aiming to maximize yield per unit of tracking error relative to the broad market.

Other compelling strategies also employ custom indexes aimed at delivering excess or multiplied dividend yield relative to the broader market. These approaches present the potential for enhanced long-only equity income, underpinned by robust proprietary optimization methods that can more holistically consider how dividend stocks behave together. As enhanced versions of the first generation of rules-based portfolios, we believe these strategies may allow portfolios to be more responsive to shifting market environments, while incrementally increasing yield.

Looking ahead, we believe dividend strategies should continue to play a vital role in portfolios. Valuations in market-cap indexes, especially in the United States, remain ambitious given the potential disruptions that loom over global trade. In this environment, we believe dividend stocks of firms with proven business models and solid profitability will tend to be sought after and present a compelling alternative to more growth-oriented exposures. With sentiment for growth stocks now at a tipping point, we believe a favorable backdrop for dividend strategies has emerged.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

This site is intended only for APAC Institutional Investors and Consultants. Using it means you agree to our Anti-Corruption Policy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.