There's a number that gets repeated every time conflict flares in the Middle East: 20%.
That's the share of global oil production that flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow chokepoint between Iran and Oman. Throw in the fact that 30% of the world's seaborne fertilizer takes the same route, and it's easy to see why markets panic whenever tensions spike.
But here's what the headlines almost never mention: there are workarounds — and they're already in use.
The pipeline nobody's talking about
Saudi Arabia, the world's swing oil producer, has a dedicated East-West pipeline that routes crude overland to ports on the Red Sea — completely bypassing the Strait. The UAE, meanwhile, ships significant fertilizer volumes via land to ports that sit outside the Hormuz choke point entirely.
These diversions don't eliminate the risk. A full closure would still be painful. But they do explain why, even as conflict raged in the region in early 2026, the economic damage has been more contained than the scariest headlines implied.
The practical upshot: West Texas Intermediate crude above $100 per barrel and U.S. gasoline above $4 per gallon represent genuine economic pain — but the catastrophic scenario that some feared has not materialized, in part because the global energy system is more resilient than most people realize.
A tale of two reserve strategies
Here's a second counterintuitive wrinkle that's reshaping the geopolitical picture. China has spent years building up extensive strategic reserves of oil and other commodities. The United States, by contrast, has drawn its reserves down.
That asymmetry matters enormously right now. With Presidents Trump and Xi scheduled to meet in Beijing in May 2026 for a rescheduled trade summit, the common assumption is that America arrives at the table in a position of strength. The reserve gap suggests the reality may be more complicated.
Meanwhile: emerging markets just had a remarkable April
After a sharp selloff in March 2026 — driven largely by the outbreak of Middle East conflict — emerging market equities came roaring back. The MSCI EM Index delivered a 14.73% return in April alone, compared to 9.64% for the broader MSCI World Index. A ceasefire helped. So did AI.
In South Korea, Taiwan, and China — the EM world's biggest equity markets — AI-related growth narratives simply outweighed energy price fear. Demand for AI infrastructure keeps expanding, driven by better model performance and widening productivity gains. For these markets, the AI story is structural in a way that a commodity price spike is not.
The bottom line
Emerging markets are not a single monolithic bet. The real opportunity is selective: some countries are riding AI tailwinds, others are navigating commodity crossfires, and geopolitical alignment is increasingly sorting winners from losers. The investors who understand the nuance — including the hidden pipelines and the reserve imbalances — will be better positioned than those reading only the headlines.
Make emerging markets a continuous conversation
Markets don’t stand still—and neither does our thinking. Join a growing community of investors who receive our latest emerging markets research, data-driven insights, and evolving views as global conditions change.