Here's a fact that surprises most investors: emerging market debt is now the largest aggregate pool of non-financial credit in the world. It surpassed the US credit market over the past decade. And yet, most portfolios treat it like a side bet — something you add a little of when conditions are favourable, and flee when they're not.
That approach made sense once. It doesn't anymore.
The old story
For decades, "emerging markets" conjured a particular image: volatile currencies, unreliable governments, debt crises. Countries that borrowed in US dollars because no one trusted their own currency. Investors played along — allocating small, tactical slices of EM debt when global liquidity was loose, then pulling back the moment risk appetite soured.
That narrative has aged poorly.
What's actually changed
Start with debt. The common assumption is that "developed" countries are fiscally responsible while "emerging" ones are precarious. The IMF's projections for 2026 turn that assumption on its head: every G7 country except Germany is expected to carry a debt-to-GDP ratio above 100%. The United States faces large structural deficits projected out over the next decade. Japan. The EU. Meanwhile, many emerging economies — which have been quietly building fiscal discipline for years — offer a more favourable balance between growth potential and aggregate debt.
The monetary policy story is equally striking. In 2022, when inflation surged globally, it was central banks in Latin America — not the US Federal Reserve — that moved first to raise interest rates. They read the warning signs early, acted decisively, and began easing before most developed market peers. That kind of proactive, independent monetary management was once rare in EM economies. Now it's increasingly the norm.
The stress test results are in
The real proof came during recent market turbulences. Historically, a spike in volatility almost always meant a sharp selloff in EM debt. But during the trade disruption of "Liberation Day" and the outbreak of the Iran conflict, major EM debt indexes held their ground. They absorbed shocks that, in an earlier era, would have triggered a rout. Markets noticed — and the explanation is structural: more EM countries now operate with stronger policy frameworks and larger financial buffers than before.
What this means for investors
None of this means EM debt is without risk. But the risk profile has changed — and so has the opportunity. EM debt has historically offered higher yields than developed market bonds, providing a meaningful income advantage. It also shows lower correlation to core bonds than investment-grade corporates, and lower correlation to equities than high-yield bonds. In plain terms: it can earn more and diversify better than many of the alternatives already sitting in most portfolios.
The question investors should be asking isn't "should I take a tactical position in EM debt when conditions look good?" It's: "Am I systematically underweighting an asset class that has quietly become one of the most compelling in the world?"
The old playbook said: dip in, get out. The new evidence says something different.
Make emerging markets a continuous conversation
Markets don’t stand still—and neither does our thinking. Join a growing community of investors who receive our latest emerging markets research, data-driven insights, and evolving views as global conditions change.